Is This a Good Deal? Price History Insights
Our price tracker reveals that AFOQT & TBAS Prep typically retails for $29.99. This is a rare 100% discount.
App Price
[Free] $29.99 → Free
View History
| start | end | change |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-12-28 | 2026-06-10 | $29.99 → Free |
| 2026-06-10 | Now | Free |
Editor's Note: This developer usually offers limited-time promo windows. Act fast before the price reverts.
Why We Recommended It
AFOQT & TBAS Prep is currently free for macOS, normally a $29.99 investment, making it an unbeatable resource for anyone serious about Air Force officer or pilot selection. Unlike generic test-prep apps, this one is tailor-made for the AFOQT and TBAS exams, combining 82 lessons, 160+ flashcard decks, and 1,500+ sample questions with adaptive practice tests that zero in on your weak spots. It even includes specialized simulators — Multi-Tasking, UAV, and Stick & Rudder — that mirror real cockpit assessments, a rare find in study tools. If you're preparing for aviation aptitude tests or pilot training pipelines, this is the most targeted and feature-rich option available on the Mac App Store right now. Grab it while it's free: all full-access features unlock with a one-time in-app purchase that's waived during this promotion, and content works offline once downloaded, perfect for deployments or travel. Don't miss the chance to build confidence without spending a dime.
Why AFOQT & TBAS Prep is Worth Grabbing Today
Key Features & Value Propositions
Deal Rarity: This app rarely goes on sale. The last recorded price drop was on 2026-07-18. This is the absolute best time to download it.
- Optimized Performance: All content downloads for offline use, ensuring fast, uninterrupted study sessions even in low-connectivity environments.
- Pro-Level Workflow: From initial diagnostic exams to targeted practice on weak areas, the app adapts to your progress and streamlines your study workflow.
- Intuitive Interface: Clear navigation and intuitive on-screen controls make it easy to dive into lessons, flashcards, or simulators without a learning curve.
A Closer Look at AFOQT & TBAS Prep
Technical Specifications & Compatibility
User Reviews
Have enjoyed using this app to study and prepare for the test thus far, but this particular section gave me pause due to the slightly confusing and misleading review section. If someone was using this app as a sole study guide, this could hurt their chances. So I felt compelled to reach out. In the heat transfer and matter phase changes section- 3 things seemed a bit off. 1. One of the question asks for an example of radiating heat, and the correct answer is a “campfire in a vacuum” and not an electric heated baseboard, which was a different option. Ignoring the fact that a campfire, or any fire, cannot exist in a vacuum, wouldn’t electromagnetically generated ambient heat be a slightly better example? Considering it would generate heat without air… whereas a campfire literally could not?2. Answer to liquid-solid question is solidification, but is is not mentioned in the review text, only the term freezing, so I think this should be updated.3. The last question asks for an example of conduction. The text explicitly uses the boiling of water on a stove as an example of conduction. This is an option for answers in the review, but is somehow incorrect. “Ice melting in your hand” is the correct answer. I can see an argument that TECHNICALLY it is a better example as the heat generated by the hands is conducted to the ice, whereas the heat is not generated directly into the water to boil it, but rather the pot, but it is still very much conduction. Normally this wouldn’t bug me, and it’s the first number of errors I’ve found so far, but I feel like if I was trying to use this app to learn this information for the first time or review it better, then this would do more harm than good. Hope this helps! Great app and super easy to use otherwise!
Have enjoyed using this app to study and prepare for the test thus far, but this particular section gave me pause due to the slightly confusing and misleading review section. If someone was using this app as a sole study guide, this could hurt their chances. So I felt compelled to reach out. In the heat transfer and matter phase changes section- 3 things seemed a bit off. 1. One of the question asks for an example of radiating heat, and the correct answer is a “campfire in a vacuum” and not an electric heated baseboard, which was a different option. Ignoring the fact that a campfire, or any fire, cannot exist in a vacuum, wouldn’t electromagnetically generated ambient heat be a slightly better example? Considering it would generate heat without air… whereas a campfire literally could not?2. Answer to liquid-solid question is solidification, but is is not mentioned in the review text, only the term freezing, so I think this should be updated.3. The last question asks for an example of conduction. The text explicitly uses the boiling of water on a stove as an example of conduction. This is an option for answers in the review, but is somehow incorrect. “Ice melting in your hand” is the correct answer. I can see an argument that TECHNICALLY it is a better example as the heat generated by the hands is conducted to the ice, whereas the heat is not generated directly into the water to boil it, but rather the pot, but it is still very much conduction. Normally this wouldn’t bug me, and it’s the first number of errors I’ve found so far, but I feel like if I was trying to use this app to learn this information for the first time or review it better, then this would do more harm than good. Hope this helps! Great app and super easy to use otherwise!
Have enjoyed using this app to study and prepare for the test thus far, but this particular section gave me pause due to the slightly confusing and misleading review section. If someone was using this app as a sole study guide, this could hurt their chances. So I felt compelled to reach out. In the heat transfer and matter phase changes section- 3 things seemed a bit off. 1. One of the question asks for an example of radiating heat, and the correct answer is a “campfire in a vacuum” and not an electric heated baseboard, which was a different option. Ignoring the fact that a campfire, or any fire, cannot exist in a vacuum, wouldn’t electromagnetically generated ambient heat be a slightly better example? Considering it would generate heat without air… whereas a campfire literally could not?2. Answer to liquid-solid question is solidification, but is is not mentioned in the review text, only the term freezing, so I think this should be updated.3. The last question asks for an example of conduction. The text explicitly uses the boiling of water on a stove as an example of conduction. This is an option for answers in the review, but is somehow incorrect. “Ice melting in your hand” is the correct answer. I can see an argument that TECHNICALLY it is a better example as the heat generated by the hands is conducted to the ice, whereas the heat is not generated directly into the water to boil it, but rather the pot, but it is still very much conduction. Normally this wouldn’t bug me, and it’s the first number of errors I’ve found so far, but I feel like if I was trying to use this app to learn this information for the first time or review it better, then this would do more harm than good. Hope this helps! Great app and super easy to use otherwise!
Have enjoyed using this app to study and prepare for the test thus far, but this particular section gave me pause due to the slightly confusing and misleading review section. If someone was using this app as a sole study guide, this could hurt their chances. So I felt compelled to reach out. In the heat transfer and matter phase changes section- 3 things seemed a bit off. 1. One of the question asks for an example of radiating heat, and the correct answer is a “campfire in a vacuum” and not an electric heated baseboard, which was a different option. Ignoring the fact that a campfire, or any fire, cannot exist in a vacuum, wouldn’t electromagnetically generated ambient heat be a slightly better example? Considering it would generate heat without air… whereas a campfire literally could not?2. Answer to liquid-solid question is solidification, but is is not mentioned in the review text, only the term freezing, so I think this should be updated.3. The last question asks for an example of conduction. The text explicitly uses the boiling of water on a stove as an example of conduction. This is an option for answers in the review, but is somehow incorrect. “Ice melting in your hand” is the correct answer. I can see an argument that TECHNICALLY it is a better example as the heat generated by the hands is conducted to the ice, whereas the heat is not generated directly into the water to boil it, but rather the pot, but it is still very much conduction. Normally this wouldn’t bug me, and it’s the first number of errors I’ve found so far, but I feel like if I was trying to use this app to learn this information for the first time or review it better, then this would do more harm than good. Hope this helps! Great app and super easy to use otherwise!
Have enjoyed using this app to study and prepare for the test thus far, but this particular section gave me pause due to the slightly confusing and misleading review section. If someone was using this app as a sole study guide, this could hurt their chances. So I felt compelled to reach out. In the heat transfer and matter phase changes section- 3 things seemed a bit off. 1. One of the question asks for an example of radiating heat, and the correct answer is a “campfire in a vacuum” and not an electric heated baseboard, which was a different option. Ignoring the fact that a campfire, or any fire, cannot exist in a vacuum, wouldn’t electromagnetically generated ambient heat be a slightly better example? Considering it would generate heat without air… whereas a campfire literally could not?2. Answer to liquid-solid question is solidification, but is is not mentioned in the review text, only the term freezing, so I think this should be updated.3. The last question asks for an example of conduction. The text explicitly uses the boiling of water on a stove as an example of conduction. This is an option for answers in the review, but is somehow incorrect. “Ice melting in your hand” is the correct answer. I can see an argument that TECHNICALLY it is a better example as the heat generated by the hands is conducted to the ice, whereas the heat is not generated directly into the water to boil it, but rather the pot, but it is still very much conduction. Normally this wouldn’t bug me, and it’s the first number of errors I’ve found so far, but I feel like if I was trying to use this app to learn this information for the first time or review it better, then this would do more harm than good. Hope this helps! Great app and super easy to use otherwise!
No reviews yet. We'll update once we fetch reviews.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is AFOQT & TBAS Prep really free to keep?
Yes. When you download it during this promotional window, the app is yours to keep in your account.
Will I need to pay for IAPs later?
We verified core features are included in this free offer. Optional premium services may require separate purchase.